Diet blog: the 1950s healthy diet

Judith Wills / 01 May 2017

Our diet expert considers whether the British diet of the Fifties and Sixties was healthier.



Last time I was looking at the new crop of diets for the season but really there is little truly new in the world of diets, is there?  Most are just tweaking things that have gone before.  E.g. the 5:2 diet was based on reducing calories, but in a slightly more radical way than normal.

Many modern diets, we found, are variations on the Mediterranean theme – the classic Med theme, that is (because the truth is that most people in the Mediterranean countries today don’t eat a healthy Mediterranean diet any more than we do!).

10 healthy Mediterranean foods

And similarly, in the UK, we no longer eat a traditional British diet, but a rag bag of dishes from here and there all over the world.  Perhaps it is this eclectic mix of burgers, bakes and curries that makes us one of the fattest nations in the world.

What would happen if we went back to eating the food of our parents and grandparents; of the first 50 years of the 20th century?  Would we then be as slim and healthy as the people of southern Italy?

I tried to think what my own family ate when I was a child in the 1950s, and eventually most of the week’s eating came back to me.  It was Weetabix for breakfast with milk (always full fat of course) and a tiny bit of white sugar during the week, with boiled egg and toast on a Saturday and bacon and egg on a Sunday.  School lunches during the week – small and plain and not what you’d want second helpings of – stuffed lamb’s heart, anyone?

Old-fashioned British superfoods

At weekends, our main meal of the day was at lunchtime.  Maybe lamb or pork chop, mash and green veggies or a meat stew with root vegetables on a Saturday, or in summer a salad with salad cream and either ham or cheese, and bread.  Our traditional Sunday lunch was usually roast chicken and several plainly-cooked vegetables, followed by a fruit crumble with Birds custard.  Weekday evening meals were often more like snacks, if we’d had school ‘dinner’. Beans on toast or poached eggs on toast, for example, or a bowl of soup or a cheese and tomato sandwich or tinned salmon with cucumber and lettuce.  On Friday nights, we might have a small piece of white fish each, plainly cooked with boiled potatoes, peas and salad cream again.

I don’t recall eating snacks between meals apart from a few sweets after rationing ended in 1953, at the weekend.  I don’t recall ever feeling hungry enough between meals to crave one.  Maybe the occasional small (and they were small) bag of Smith’s Crisps with the little salt wrap inside the bag, but mainly snacks were British fruits such as apples, pears, plums or berries in summer; which we’d also eat, raw, as a pudding most days of the week.

Take control of snacking

It’s incredible to think that in the Fifties and even early 60s, my mother had the milk delivered and in summer had a hole in the ground covered by a stone slab, to keep it cool. 

Without a freezer or even a fridge, we really did eat seasonally.  We also ate locally and, lacking the influence of most foreign country cuisines, we ate plain.  An orange at the bottom of your Christmas stocking really was an amazing treat. 

So, was this a healthy diet or was it not?  In many ways, yes.  The plainness of the food meant that we were probably consuming many fewer calories and less fat and sugar than most people do today.  Also, portions were much smaller than most people eat now.  I think everyone had got so used to rationing that it was hard to get out of the habit.  We also tended to eat more protein (when meat rationing ended, at any rate) and less refined carb, which many experts believe today is a simple way to stay slim.  We had plenty of vegetables, particularly leafy greens.  And the fruits we ate were naturally lower in sugars than most of the fruit consumed today.  Fruit was a treat rather than something we ate two or three times a day – I am a great believer that when getting your five, seven or ten a day (whichever edict you follow!) they should mostly be vegetables rather than fruit.

10 ways to eat less sugar

We ate pulses – soups and stews with lentils were the favourite and we had raw nuts when we could get them, that we had to crack open ourselves so that naturally limited the amount. 

We ate butter rather than any other type of spread – again, finding favour today.

With no refrigeration there was little immediately available to eat at home except what was cooked for meals, at which the whole family gathered.  So you were glad to eat what you were given and nothing else.  And when you were out and about, snack foods were hard to come by, not ubiquitous.

Downside?  Maybe we didn’t eat enough fish, but that could just have been our family as I know the fishing industry was thriving and our seas packed, and we didn’t tend to eat any ‘exotic’ oils, such as olive oil, which you couldn’t buy except in 100ml bottles at the chemist, but even so, incidence of heart disease then was pretty low.

We ate a lot of dairy and eggs, both now back on the ‘good food’ list.  However, I never tasted yogurt until I was 15, and then it was a Ski blackcurrant yogurt rather than an organic natural.  We’d not heard of promoting healthy gut bacteria in those days, but we now know that prime aged cheeses do the same job, and we had plenty of those.

So, on balance, I’d say we ate well.  Moderately, but with everything we needed to be slim yet strong, full of energy and with a full set of teeth not rotted by sugar.  Most importantly, we definitely ate to live, rather than living to eat.  And if we had a treat – a piece of chocolate, or a (small) slice of cake – it was just that, an occasional treat, not a daily or hourly occurrence. 

I never thought I’d say this, but I’m quite missing those meals of my childhood right now.

It really is not so much which country has the healthiest diet, I am sure, but how we find a way of getting back to a long gone style of eating, whether that is in the UK or down Sicily way. 

Try 12 issues of Saga Magazine for just £12

Subscribe today for just £12 for 12 issues...



The opinions expressed are those of the author and are not held by Saga unless specifically stated.

The material is for general information only and does not constitute investment, tax, legal, medical or other form of advice. You should not rely on this information to make (or refrain from making) any decisions. Always obtain independent, professional advice for your own particular situation.